<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lexicon: Dude Art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewvenell.com/blog/writing/lexicon-dude-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewvenell.com/blog/writing/lexicon-dude-art/</link>
	<description>American Multimedia Artist, San Francisco, CA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:17:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Subscriptions on the Rise &#124; The Present Group Journal</title>
		<link>http://andrewvenell.com/blog/writing/lexicon-dude-art/comment-page-1/#comment-9733</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Subscriptions on the Rise &#124; The Present Group Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewvenell.com/site/?p=260#comment-9733</guid>
		<description>[...] It seems like this is an interesting model because it could be a quick platform for artists to get a little exposure and probably get somewhere between $10- $20 (I&#8217;m guessing) per piece for doing this.  Now, this is very little money, however it does encourage artists to have deadlines and try out new ideas and still get a little pocket change for it.  From the gallery&#8217;s perspective there is much less organizing, as they aren&#8217;t the one producing the projects.  Because it is very locally focused, I also like that they have little &#8220;Pickup Parties&#8221; where people can get together, get their art, and probably meet the artists from time to time.  When we were first talking about art in a subscription format, we envisioned a time when there would be all sorts of categories and audiences - which I think is really great.  Some would classify the art that comes out of this subscription as verging on  &#8220;Dude/tte art&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It seems like this is an interesting model because it could be a quick platform for artists to get a little exposure and probably get somewhere between $10- $20 (I&#8217;m guessing) per piece for doing this.  Now, this is very little money, however it does encourage artists to have deadlines and try out new ideas and still get a little pocket change for it.  From the gallery&#8217;s perspective there is much less organizing, as they aren&#8217;t the one producing the projects.  Because it is very locally focused, I also like that they have little &#8220;Pickup Parties&#8221; where people can get together, get their art, and probably meet the artists from time to time.  When we were first talking about art in a subscription format, we envisioned a time when there would be all sorts of categories and audiences &#8211; which I think is really great.  Some would classify the art that comes out of this subscription as verging on  &#8220;Dude/tte art&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

